Certainly! Here’s is a response to Zach Daniel’s post about the new AI policy in his Ash project:

Hello Mr. Da—

Naw, I’m kidding It’s cool to see this.

To be honest, I’m not sure what concretely you are suggesting here. This is not a legal document, it doesn’t have to hold up in court. People can have different interpretations of it. Ultimately it will be applied as a case by case basis based on my judgement or someone else’s on the core team judgement, and people will just have to be okay with that

FWIW: If I literally cannot tell that something was LLM generated, then I don’t care if it was LLM generated in the context of code.

If we want to talk to an AI, we will ask them ourselves . We expect all interactions to be human interactions.

I love this Zach!

To be clear, this document does not in any way change the rights of source or attempt to relicense someone else’s source code. We cannot nor will we ever be in control of or be able to detect fraudelent activities of those making PRs.

This is true in theory but in practice it is usually extremely obvious. I have no doubt a skilled actor could generate realistic text but most LLM spam I see is very low-effort and easy to spot (something which has been true of spam in general basically forever).

Maybe this will change, of course. But people have been saying that for a while now, so who knows.