numso
Code Coverage incorrect for function with multiple clauses
Hi all!
I noticed something odd while testing one of my LiveViews today. I wrote a test for one of the handle_event/3 function clauses. Made the test pass. Verified that the assigns were getting set correctly. Then discovered that code coverage wasn’t marking that code as having been run. I added an IO.inspect/2, saw the log in my test output, but code coverage still says that IO.inspect line was never run.
I was able to make a very minimal reproduction in a brand new mix new project:
elixir 1.17.3-otp-27
erlang 27.1
defmodule CoverageBug do
def hello do
check("target", nil)
:world
end
def check("one", _) do
nil
end
def check("two", _) do
nil
end
def check(_, %{some_match: :three}) do
nil
end
def check("four", _) do
nil
end
def check("target", _) do
IO.inspect("This line is run but not covered")
nil
end
end
defmodule CoverageBugTest do
use ExUnit.Case
test "greets the world" do
assert CoverageBug.hello() == :world
end
end
When running mix test --cover, you’ll see the IO.inspect line logged out in the test output. But it won’t show up as covered in the test coverage report. If you delete any of those first 4 check function clauses, then the IO.inspect in the 5th clause will start being reported as covered. Has anyone experienced anything like this? Am I missing something obvious?
Marked As Solved
numso
I ended up trying this with a different version of erlang and it worked:
elixir 1.17.3-otp-26
erlang 26.2.5.3
So looks like this was a regression in the latest erlang major release.







