I just ask to claude code to make sample pages with fluxon UI for several usecases.
With this simple prompt, claude code generated these pages. Before I did vibe coding for vanila react/typescript but results pages are messy.
I ask claude code why u can generate such well designed pages. He responded it’s because of well considered implementation of fluxon ui.
Each components are designed with harmonized color, consistent space, accessibility.
For claude code, I think elixir and fluxon ui are probably little bit minor but fluxon ui has good abstraction for components design, so the knowledge of claude code for good design seems to utilize such abstraction to generate well designed pages.
I don’t understand how ui library should be and i’m not sure these claude opinion is right or not. Though, these results are really acceptable for me.

The abstraction for component design what I said above is not special thing which only fluxon supoorts, probably other library like tailwind plus and shadcn support too.
But fluxon is designed for liveview. I didn’t use fluxon well until now, just scratch the surface. It’s paid library but if using it support ui making works well, I think it worth it.
I’ll try fluxon for my vibe coding. If I found something new, I’ll report again.

claude code response -----------------------

In magic_of_fluxon_ui.md, u
summerieze how fluxon works to
create bettern design. other
library like shadcn,tailwind plus
also support same functionality
from the view point of style
making?

Great question! Yes, other
libraries like shadcn/ui and
Tailwind UI provide similar
functionality. Let me compare
them:

Design System Libraries
Comparison

Fluxon (Phoenix LiveView)

  <.button variant="solid"
  color="blue" size="lg">
    <.icon name="hero-shopping-cart"
   />
    Add to Cart
  </.button>

shadcn/ui (React)

  <Button variant="default"
  size="lg" className="w-full">
    <ShoppingCart className="mr-2 
  h-4 w-4" />
    Add to Cart
  </Button>

Tailwind UI (HTML/React/Vue)

  <button class="inline-flex 
  items-center justify-center 
  rounded-md bg-blue-600 px-4 py-2 
  text-sm font-medium text-white 
  hover:bg-blue-700">
    Add to Cart
  </button>

Key Similarities

All provide the same 4 Refactoring
UI principles:

1. Color Theory

• Fluxon: color=“blue” → semantic
  color system
• shadcn/ui: variant=“destructive”
  → semantic variants
• Tailwind UI: bg-blue-600 →
  consistent color scales

2. Spacing System

• Fluxon: size=“lg” → py-2.5
  px-3.5
• shadcn/ui: size=“lg” → h-11 px-8
• Tailwind UI: Manual but
  consistent spacing patterns

3. Typography

• Fluxon: Built-in font hierarchy
• shadcn/ui: Consistent text-sm
  font-medium patterns
• Tailwind UI: Professional
  typography scales

4. Accessibility

• Fluxon: role=“dialog”
  aria-modal=“true”
• shadcn/ui: Radix UI primitives
  (excellent a11y)
• Tailwind UI: Semantic HTML +
  ARIA attributes

What Makes Each Special

Fluxon (Phoenix/Elixir)

• Server-side rendering focus
• LiveView integration
• Elixir-specific patterns

shadcn/ui (React)

• Copy-paste components (you own
  the code)
• Radix UI primitives (excellent
  accessibility)
• Most popular in React ecosystem

Tailwind UI (Multi-framework)

• Official Tailwind components
• Multiple frameworks (React, Vue,
  HTML)
• Premium but comprehensive

The Real Answer

Yes, they all support the same
design-making functionality! The
magic isn’t unique to Fluxon -
it’s about having:

1. Systematic design tokens
   (colors, spacing, typography)
2. Pre-built components with good
   defaults
3. Consistent API patterns
4. Accessibility built-in

Why Your Task App Was Messy vs
This Project

Without design system: Manual
decisions for every color,
spacing, font size
With any design system: Automated
good design decisions

The difference is having a design
system vs not having one, not
specifically Fluxon vs others.

Fluxon works well for you because:

• It’s designed for Phoenix
  LiveView (your tech stack)
• It follows Elixir conventions
  (.component syntax)
• It has comprehensive
  documentation and examples

All these libraries solve the same
core problem: turning design
decisions into reusable,
consistent components.

i forgot but I might give relative path to the code of fluxon ui which was installed by mix deps.get.
I didn’t do anything special. If I can dig it from Claude code chat history, I’ll paste it here.

I couldn’t dig into original prompt but claude code suggest the prompt if I ask again.
Shorter one is close to my original but original shorter than this.
I didn’t check this works or not.

Recommended Prompt:

The Fluxon UI library code is located in deps/fluxon/lib. Please create 10 real-world
application examples using Fluxon UI components.

For each example:

1. Create a complete, functional page/feature (not just component demos)
2. Use multiple Fluxon components together in realistic scenarios
3. Include proper state management and user interactions
4. Make them production-ready with error handling and loading states
5. Ensure responsive design for mobile and desktop

Suggested examples could include:

• Dashboard with stats and charts
• User profile/settings page
• E-commerce product listing
• Task management interface
• Blog/article editor
• Team member directory
• Pricing/subscription page
• File manager interface
• Calendar/scheduling view
• Analytics/reports page

Create these as separate LiveView modules with proper routing. Focus on demonstrating
how Fluxon components work together in real applications rather than isolated
component showcases.

Alternative Shorter Prompt:

Using the Fluxon UI library in deps/fluxon/lib, create 10 real-world application
examples that showcase how the components work together in production scenarios. Make
each example a complete, functional feature with proper interactions, state
management, and responsive design. Include common patterns like dashboards, forms,
data tables, and user interfaces.