venomnert

venomnert

Many to many relationship

Context:

A customer_lead can be associated to many service_category. A service_category can be associated to many customer_leads.

customerleads_service migration

 create table(:customerlead_service) do
      add :service_category_id, references("service_categories")
      add :customer_lead_id, references("customer_leads")

      timestamps()
    end

customer_service schema

schema "customerlead_service" do
    belongs_to :customer_leads, CustomerLead
    belongs_to :service_categories, ServiceCategory

    timestamps()
  end

customer migration

  create table(:customer_leads) do
      add :first_name,      :string
      add :last_name,       :string
      add :email,           :string
      add :address,         :string
      add :phone_number,    :string
      add :company_name,    :string
      add :message,         :string
      add :status,          :boolean, null: false, default: false

      timestamps()
    end

customer schema

  schema "customer_leads" do
    field :first_name,      :string
    field :last_name,       :string
    field :email,           :string
    field :address,         :string
    field :phone_number,    :string
    field :company_name,    :string
    field :message,         :string
    field :status,          :boolean

    many_to_many :service_categories, ServiceCategory,
      join_through: CustomerleadService

    timestamps()
  end
   def changeset(customer, attrs \\ %{}) do
    customer
    |> cast(attrs, @required_fields ++ @optional_fields)
    |> validate_required(@required_fields)
  end

  def add_service_to_customer_lead(changeset, attrs) do
    service = Ramlaw.Services.get_service_category_by([slug: attrs["services"]])
              |> Repo.preload(:customer_leads)

    changeset
    |> Repo.preload(:service_categories)
    |> Ecto.Changeset.change()
    |> Ecto.Changeset.put_assoc(:service_categories, [service])
    |> Repo.update!()
  end


service migration

create table(:service_categories) do
      add :title,     :string
      add :slug,      :string
      add :status,    :boolean, null: false, default: false

      timestamps()
    end

service schema

schema "service_categories" do
    field :title,   :string
    field :slug,    :string
    field :status,  :boolean

    has_many :services, Service,
      on_delete:    :delete_all,
      foreign_key:  :service_categories_id,
      on_replace:   :nilify

    many_to_many :customer_leads, CustomerLead,
      join_through: CustomerleadService

    timestamps()
  end

The problem

In my test I noticed when I first create a customer_lead, the service_category get’s associated properly

AFTER INSERT: %Ramlaw.Schema.CustomerLead{
  __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "customer_leads">,
  address: nil,
  company_name: "profilo",
  email: "venomnert1994@hotmail.com",
  first_name: "Nert",
  id: 4,
  inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
  last_name: "test",
  message: "fdafsa",
  phone_number: "6473355012",
  service_categories: [
    %Ramlaw.Schema.ServiceCategory{
      __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "service_categories">,
      customer_leads: [],
      id: 10,
      inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
      services: #Ecto.Association.NotLoaded<association :services is not loaded>,
      slug: "family-law",
      status: false,
      title: "Family Law",
      updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
    }
  ],
  status: nil,
  updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}

However, when I query the same customer_lead that was added, its service_category is empty. Also this applies to the associated service_category as well.

Code snippet

service_cat
    |> Repo.preload(:customer_leads)
    |> IO.inspect(label: "RESULTS")

 ClientLeads.get_client_lead(added_client.id)
    |> IO.inspect(label: "TEST")

result

RESULTS: %Ramlaw.Schema.ServiceCategory{
  __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "service_categories">,
  customer_leads: [],
  id: 10,
  inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
  services: #Ecto.Association.NotLoaded<association :services is not loaded>,
  slug: "family-law",
  status: nil,
  title: "Family Law",
  updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}
TEST: %Ramlaw.Schema.CustomerLead{
  __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "customer_leads">,
  address: nil,
  company_name: "profilo",
  email: "venomnert1994@hotmail.com",
  first_name: "Nert",
  id: 4,
  inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
  last_name: "test",
  message: "fdafsa",
  phone_number: "6473355012",
  service_categories: [],
  status: false,
  updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}

I feel like I have set up everything correctly regarding the many-to-many association; however, i’m not able to retrieve the associations.

Most Liked

csisnett

csisnett

timestamps() don’t work when you create an intermediary record like that. You have to create a new record independently by passing the parents tables IDs as attributes. The problem I’ve had with the update syntax as shown in the elixir school article is that you’re replacing all intermediary records customer_lead_services with those specific customer_lead_id and service_categories_id, so it’s not the best option to use the syntax if you want to continue to add intermediary records afterward.

venomnert

venomnert

If anyone else runs into this issue, the solution is to remove schema for the joining table customer_service schema.

And update your schema to the following, which is to remove the timestamp:

customerleads_service migration

 create table(:customerlead_service) do
      add :service_category_id, references("service_categories")
      add :customer_lead_id, references("customer_leads")
    end

However, I’m not sure as to why the schema was causing this issue though.

Also this post at ElixirSchool definitely helped:

csisnett

csisnett

Sure no problem @venomnert,

you would need a changeset function for the customerlead_service schema as well.

def changeset(customerlead_service, attrs) do
  customerlead_service
  |> cast(attrs, [:customer_leads_id, :service_categories_id])
  |> validate_required([:customer_leads_id, :service_categories_id])
end

To create the record you would need the parent tables to be created already


customer_lead = %CustomerLead{...}
service_category = %ServiceCategory{...}
attrs = %{"customer_leads_id" => customerlead.id, "service_categories_id" => service_category.id}

and call this function (which should be in your Context) passing attrs

def create_customerlead_service(attrs = %{}) do
  %CustomerLeadService{}
  |> CustomerLeadService.changeset(attrs)
  |> Repo.insert()
end

Not relevant to the question but I would change field names in the customerlead_service schema from :customer_leads and :service_categories to :customer_lead and service_category as you’re only referring to one and not several in the intermediary table.

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

openscript
Hello! Sorry for this astonishing simple question, but I’m really stuck. I try to set up the intellij-elixir plugin, but I don’t know ho...
New
jerry
Good day to you all. I have been struggling to get a query involving like and ilike to work. Can anyone assist me on this, please? pro...
New
quazar
How to set Jason to encode all fields in ecto schema, I don’t care about security and implementing only is taking long list of attributes...
New
fireproofsocks
I’m working on defining a simple Ecto schema for a table (in PostGres), but I don’t see where I can define a column as NOT NULL. Conside...
New
sacepums
Hey guys. I'm new to elixir and im really stocked about it. But I ran into a bit of problem - I need to convert a date sting, for examp...
New
myronmarston
The Elixir Typespec docs show the following syntax for keyword lists in typespecs: # ... | [key: type] # keyword lis...
New
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background Let’s assume I have a typical GenServer that receives messages as requests, does some operation in a DB and returns responses....
New
chewm
Hi guys, nice to meet you to the whole forum, I’m new here, I’m trying to configure visual studio code for elixir, right now the intellis...
New
WestKeys
Currently suffering from paralysis by [HTTP client] analysis. This is rather unusual in Elixirland as there tends to be consensus on the ...
New
hpopp
To simplify some tasks at work, I wrote and published this package yesterday. It’s a simple macro that enables Access behaviour on struct...
New

Other popular topics Top

peerreynders
Manning 2016 Halloween weekend sale via Deal of the Day Friday, October 28 - Half off all MEAPs - code WM102816LT Saturday, October 29 ...
326 29600 154
New
dotdotdotPaul
Okay, I'm having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to best handle the validation of belongs_to associations in Ecto. I'm sure I'...
New
aalberti333
As the title describes, I’m trying to run Enum.map() over a list of key/value pairs, where the value is a map. My data looks like this: ...
New
New
jononomo
I am trying to figure out how Mix knows whether the environment is test, dev, or prod -- where is this set? Thanks.
New
vertexbuffer
Hello, can anybody help here..? I have a list of players and I what to delete an element, but every for loop the list is reverting to ori...
New
rms.mrcs
Hi, I need to transform a list of numbers into a map where the keys are the indexes and the values are the original values of the list....
New
baxterw3b
Hi guys, i’m new in the Elixir world, and i have to say, that i love it! i’m having some problem to understand anonymous functions with ...
New
chrisalley
ExUnit now has describe blocks which is a welcome addition coming from RSpec. In the docs, it states that nested hierarchies of describe ...
New
joeerl
Hello again - after a longish gap I’ve decided I really must dig into Elixir and see what’s been happening here - so I have a few questio...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement