yourpalal
With/1 design patterns
When using with/1 to handle a bunch of matches and things that return {:ok, _} or :error or {:error, _} I often need to differentiate between errors, and I’ll wrap the individual matches in tuples, like this:
with(
{{:ok, shoes}, _} <- {get_shoes(outfit), :shoes},
{{:ok, shirt}, _} <- {get_shirt(outfit), :shirt},
{true, _} <- {shoes_match_shirt?(shoes, shirt), :matching}
) do
{:ok, "service allowed"}
else
{error, :shoes} ->
{:error, "you forgot your shoes!"}
_ ->
:error
end
Mainly, I’m just curious how other people are handling things like this! What are you doing when you need to handle multiple error cases from with/1 ? One obvious solution is to give up on with/1 and use if or regular case statements or something like that.
Second, I’m open to any suggestions/criticism of the above code style.
Most Liked
hlx
I think you’re better of returning a more meaningful error from get_shoes/1
Example
{:error, {ShoesNotFound, "you forgot your shoes!"}}
# or
{:error, %ShoesNotFound{message: "you forgot your shoes!"}}
peerreynders
instead of
Map.fetch(params, :shoes)
design patterns
Following Scott Wlaschin’s guidance - use functions!
def fetch_item(map, key) do
case Map.fetch(map, key) do
:error ->
{:error, key}
result ->
result
end
end
...
with(
{:ok, shoes} <- fetch_item(outfit, :shoes),
{:ok, shirt} <- fetch_item(outfit, :shirt),
{true, _} <- {shoes_match_shirt?(shoes, shirt), :matching}
) do
{:ok, "service allowed"}
else
{:error, :shoes} ->
{:error, "you forgot your shoes!"}
_ ->
:error
end
...
or
def fetch_item(map, key, msg) when is_binary(msg) do
case Map.fetch(map, key) do
:error ->
{:error, msg}
result ->
result
end
end
...
with(
{:ok, shoes} <- fetch_item(outfit, :shoes, "you forgot your shoes!"),
{:ok, shirt} <- fetch_item(outfit, :shirt, "you forgot your shirt!"),
{true, _} <- {shoes_match_shirt?(shoes, shirt), :matching}
) do
{:ok, "service allowed"}
else
{:error, msg} = msg_error when is_binary(msg) ->
msg_error
_ ->
:error
end
...
peerreynders
The idiom is {:ok, value}, {:error, reason}
So the pattern match should focus on the contents of reason.
For example:
Process.monitor/1 will result in a general message of the format:
{:DOWN, ref, :process, object, reason}
where reason can take on values like :normal, :noproc or :noconnection, i.e. values that are highly distinct and imply their context. So it’s a good idea to follow the same practice with {:error, reason} tuples.
idi527

If you care about specific errors for your conditions, you might be better off with case.
case get_shoes(outfit) do
{:ok, shoes} ->
with
{:ok, shirt} <- get_shirt(outfit),
true <- shoes_match_shirt?(shoes, shirt) do
{:ok, "service allowed"}
else
_ -> :error
end
_error ->
{:error, "you forgot your shoes!"}
end
You can also try reversing the logic for the with expression thus making the successful path the “exception”. Might not be applicable here, though.
yourpalal
Lots of good ideas from people
I should mention that get_shoes/get_shirt are standins for code from the std. lib, or ecto or plug or whatever. They might be code I own, or maybe not.
The idea of improving the error messages is good, and in some cases could be done by changing what functions are used, too, eg. Map.get(params, :shoes, {:error, :no_shoes}) instead of Map.fetch(params, :shoes)








